Volume 12, Issue 1 (3-2024)
JRIA 2024, 12(1): 111-136 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
khodadad N, khalili A, Mirza Kochch Khoshnevis A. Bibliometric Analysis and Systematic Review of Infill Development Based on Mapping the Scientific Fields Structure. JRIA 2024; 12 (1) :111-136
URL: http://jria.iust.ac.ir/article-1-1723-en.html
URL: http://jria.iust.ac.ir/article-1-1723-en.html
University of Science and Industry
Abstract: (1048 Views)
Today, new constructions are an unavoidable necessity for sustaining life within historical contexts. the purpose of this research is multifaceted, aiming to raise awareness among researchers in this scientific field, identify thematic gaps to prevent redundant research, and conduct a scientometric analysis of infill development studies. The objective is to uncover primary issues and advancements, assess the apparent performance trends of articles and journals, and discern patterns of collaboration, thereby elucidating the intellectual structure of the scientific field in infill development To accomplish these objectives, the identification and extraction of concepts and influential dimensions regarding the development of interactivity were conducted by utilizing both domestic and foreign documentary and library sources.There are several methods for evaluating and measuring scientific productions and created from the methods used in scientometrics, which are popular for analyzing the structure of knowledge in different fields of science, and examines the relationship between the words used in different parts of the documents. It is scientometric, which in the present research In this current research, co-occurrence, degree centrality, degree myopia, co-authorship, and bibliographic coupling have been analyzed using quantitative methods. The findings derived from drawing and analyzing maps depicting the simultaneous occurrence of two items based on keywords reveal that the terms 'infill development' and 'urban development' exhibit the highest total link strength and frequency of co-occurrences among the investigated items. In the centrality analysis, the keywords 'intermediate development,' 'urban development,' 'urban planning,' and 'land use' demonstrated the highest degree of centrality in the examination of the co-lexical density map of the keywords, the amount of link in the network is high and the flow of information is transferred at a suitable speed. In the analysis of the co-authorship network concerning researchers, Hogue stands out with the most articles, having five articles and fourteen links. Additionally, in the analysis of the bibliographic pair based on journals, 'Journal of Land Use Policy' holds the top position, exhibiting a total strength of 34 and a link count of 13. In the continuation of the research, the obtained results are mentioned. Cooccurrence based on keywords in the network visualization: The high link strength of infill development means that this keyword has been seen more times in an article and the probability of this keyword appearing with other keywords in an article is higher. Urban planning, urban development, land use are other frequent and explanatory keywords in the topic of in fill development Co-occurrence based on keywords in the Overlay visualization: The color of each item is determined by the average score of the year of publication. The green color indicates that these keywords have become popular in the field of infill development in recent years. Also, the yellow color indicates that these keywords are related to the years after 2018, in other words, they have attracted the attention of researchers in recent years, and they can be used for more research. The items related to the years 2012 and before (purple color) means that the keywords related to these years have been the focus of articles and researchers in the field of infill development in the early years, and nowadays they are less or not even addressed at all.Co-occurrence based on keywords in the Density visualization: Keywords are colored depending on their occurrence, the higher the frequency of a word, the closer it is to yellow, it has a high density and is more important in the network, and the lower the frequency of occurrence of keywords, the closer it is to blue. The scientific map of infill development and urban development have the highest density Co-authorship by authors in the network visualization: Common relationships between authors will help to understand the existing contributions and identify potential collaborators and improve cooperation between them. In this network, the highest total link related to Hugo has 5 articles and 14 links, and McCary, Panso have the highest total link, respectively.co-occurrence network based on degree centrality: The most influential topics in the field: infill development, development, urban planning, landuse, urban development. Items that have a larger size than other items are more frequent and have more degree centrality and are more powerful.Co-occurrence network based on closeness centrality: The issues of urban growth, infill development, land use planning, which are able to reach other issues with a shorter path and receive information with less intermediaries and faster than others, and generally have more power and influence in the network.Co-occurrence network based on betweenness centrality: the topics:urban sprawl, infill development, urban development have more betweenness centrality, and it is possible to transfer information through these topics and these topics are mediators that transmit information more .Bibliographic coupling based on journals in network visualization: The Journal of land use policy is the most powerful and in the first place with total link 34 and the number of links 13, and the journal of urban planning and development,applied geography,urban studies are placed in the next ranks with the total power of 12, 15 and 31, respectively.
Keywords: Infill development, Network analysis, Vosveiwer, Systematic review, Scopus scientific database
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Strategic and practical principals in Islamic architecture and urbanism
Received: 2023/12/5 | Accepted: 2024/04/15 | Published: 2024/04/17
Received: 2023/12/5 | Accepted: 2024/04/15 | Published: 2024/04/17
References
1. احمدی، حمید؛ عصاره، فریده (۱۳۹۶). مروری بر کارکردهای تحلیل هم واژگانی، مطالعات ملی کتابداری و سازماندهی اطلاعات.۲۸ (۱): ۱۲۵-۱۴۵ .
2. بیگ زاده ،حمیدرضا، (1392)، حفاظت از بافت تاریخی شهریزد و کاهش آسیب پذیری آن با تاکید بربحران ناشی از زلزله، چیدمان ، شماره 9، پاییز .
3. پاکزاد، ج، (1389). تاریخ فکری شهرسازی، تهران: آرمان شهر.
4. پریزادی،طاهر(1391)، بررسی توسعه درونی شهر با تاکید بر مسکن، مورد مطالعه شهر سنندج، پایان نامه دکتری به راهنمایی دکتر حمید رضا وارثی، گروه جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی شهری، دانشگاه اصفهان.
5. پور جعفر و همکاران (1389)، طراحی میان افزایی هماهنگ در راستای ایجاد منظر شهری مطلوب، همایش ملی منظر شهری، تهران.
6. پورموســوی، سیدموســی، ناصــر مســتوفی، انوشــیروان و شــکوهی بیدهنــدی، محمدصالــح، (1393)شناســایی اصــول و راهکارهــای اجرایــی توســعه میانافــزا در شــهر تهــران بهعنــوان یکــی از ابعــاد توســعه شــهری پایــدار، مطالعــات توســعه اجتماعــی ایــران،6(4)،37-57 .
7. پیرنیا، محمد کریم، (1378). آشنایی با معماری اسلامی ایران، تدوین: غلامحسین معماریان، دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران، چاپ اول، تهران، 391 .
8. حسن زاده م، خدادوست ر.، زندیان ف، تحلیل شاخص های هم نویسندگی، بین مرکزیت و حفره های ساختاری پژوهشگران نانوتکنولوژی ایران در نمایه استنادی علم (1370-1390) مدیریت پردازش اطلاعات 2012، 28(1):223-49.
9. رحیمی،اکبر،(1397)، توسعه میان افزای شهری،رویکردی نوین در حفظ زمین شهری در تبریز،نشریه علمی جغرافیا و برنامه ریزی،22(63)،77-98
10. ستوده. حسام الدین. متغیرهای تأثیرگذار بر طراحی موفق در بافت تاریخی شهری. مطالعات طراحی هنر، جلد 3، 2012.
11. سهیلی فریاد، عصاره ف. بررسی تراکم و اندازه شبکه هم نویسندگی در شکل گیری مجله علوم. مجله پردازش و مدیریت اطلاعات ایران 1393: 29(2):351-72.
12. سهیلی فریاد، عصاره، ف، فرج پهلو ع. تحلیل شبکه اجتماعی از پژوهشگران علم اطلاعات با هم نویسندگی. مجله پردازش و مدیریت اطلاعات. 2013، 29 (1): 191-210.
13. سهیلی، فرامرز، (1391)، تحلیل ساختار شبکه های اجتماعی هم نویسندگی بروندادهای علمی پژوهشگران علم اطلاعات به منظور شناسائی و سنجش روابط، تعاملات و راهبردهای هم نویسندگی در این حوزه. پایاننامه دکتری، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، گروه کتابداری و اطلاع رسانی
14. صارمــی، حمیدرضــا،(1392 )،بررســی توســعه از درون شــهر بروجــرد. مجلــه مدیریــت شــهری، شــماره229،32-310
15. صالحی میلانی، ساسان واعتماد، گیتی وبهزادفر ، مصطفی (1387)، استانداردهای برنامه ریزی و طراحی شهری انجمن شهر سازی آمریکا:مکان ها و مکان سازی،جامعه مهندسان مشاور ایران.
16. صدیقی، مهری، (1393)، بررسی کاربرد روش تحلیل هم رخدادی واژگان در ترسیم ساختار حوزههای علمی (مطالعه موردی: حوزه اطلاعسنجی). پژوهشنامه پردازش و مدیریت اطلاعات، 30(2)،373-396.
17. فرحزا، نریمان، (1391). علل عدم تمایل مردم به سکونت در بافت های فرسوده و رویکرد آنان به سکونت در بافت های جدید شهری، نمونه موردی: محلات شیخ داد، پشت باغ و یعقوبی (یزد)، طرح پژوهشی برای شرکت مادر تخصصی عمران و بهسازی شهری ایران، شرکت عمران و مسکنسازان استان یزد.
18. قادریــان، مســعود، (1396)، چهارچــوب توســعه میانافــزا در بافتهــای تاریخــی. بررســی مــوردی: دســتور کار طراحــی ســایت ایلچــی خــان در بافــت تاریخــی یــزد، نامــه معمــاری و شهرســازی، پائیــز و زمســتان
19. قدیری، بهرام (1385). ساختارهای جدید در محیطهای تاریخی، دفتر پژوهشهای فرهنگی، تهران.
20. مسعود، محمد و بیگ زاده شهرکی، حمیدرضا (1391). بناهای میان افزا در بافت های تاریخی، چاپ اول، آذرخش، تهران.
21. مسعود، محمد و بیگ زاده شهرکی، حمیدرضا (1391).مبانی شکلگیری بناهای میان افزا در بافت های تاریخی بر اساس بیانیهها و منشورهای بینالمللی، مطالعات و پژوهشهای شهری منطقهای، سال ششم، شماره 22، پاییز.
22. مکی زاده، فاطمه؛ حاضری، افسانه؛ حسینی نسب، سیدحسین؛ سهیلی، فرامرز (1395).تحلیل موضوعی وترسیم نقشه علمی مقالات مرتبط با حوزه درمان افسردگی پاب مد. فصلنامه مدیریت سلامت، 19(65):51-63. 33. پورموسوی، سیدموسی، ناصر مستوفی، انوشیروان و شکوهی بیدهندی، محمدصالح. (1393)شناسایی اصول و راهکارهای اجرایی توسعه میانافزا در شهر تهران به عنوان یکی از ابعاد توسعه شهری پایدار. مطالعات توسعه اجتماعی ایران6(4)،37-57.
23. نوروزی چاکلی ، مقدمه ای بر علم سنجی. تهران: سمت، 1392.
24. نوروزی چاکلی، عبدالرضا. (1390). آشنایی با علمسنجی (مبانی، مفاهیم، روابط و ریشهها). تهران: سازمان مطالعه و تدوین کتب علوم انسانی دانشگاهها (سمت).
25. Barroso M ,Laborda J .(2022) .Digital transformation and the emergence of the Fintech sector:Systematic literature review ,Digital Business,Volume ,2 Issue ,100028 ,2 ISSN,2666-9544https//:doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus2022.100028 [DOI:10.1016/j.digbus.2022.100028]
26. Chang, Y.W., Huang, M.H., & Lin, C.W. (2015). Evolution of research subjects in library and information science base on keyword, bibliographical coupling, and co-citation analyses. Scientometrics, 105(3), 2071-2087.. [DOI:10.1007/s11192-015-1762-8]
27. Corporation, T.C(1999)Introduction to data mining and knowledge discovery: TwoCrows Corporation.
28. Falconer, M,& Frank,J, (1990). Sufficiency of Infrastructure Capacity for Infill Development. Journal of Urban planning and development. 116.(3). [DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(1990)116:3(137)]
29. Faust, K(2006). Comparing social networks: size, density, and local structure. Metodoloski zvezki, 3(2), 185 [DOI:10.51936/sdbv3216]
30. Jain, A. K., Murty, M. N., & Flynn, P. J(1999). Data clustering: a review. ACM computing surveys (CSUR), 31(3), 264-323. [DOI:10.1145/331499.331504]
31. Keinitz, R.(2001),. "Managing Maryland Growth: Models And Guidelines For Infill Developmenet" Maryland Department of planning Retrieved..
32. Keong Choong, K(2008). Intellectual capital: definitions, categorization and reporting models. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9(4), 609-638. [DOI:10.1108/14691930810913186]
33. Kohler, H.-P., Behrman, J. R., & Watkins, S. C(2001). The density of social networks and fertility decisions: Evidence from South Nyanza District, Kenya. Demography, 38(1), 43-58. [DOI:10.1353/dem.2001.0005]
34. Kuzior A, Sira M. (2022). A Bibliometric Analysis of Blockchain Technology Research Using VOSviewer. Sustainability; 14(13):8206. https:// doi.org/10.3390/su14138206 [DOI:10.3390/su14138206]
35. Maryland Department of Planning. Estimating Residential Development Capacity: A Guidebook for Analysis and Implementation in Maryland,2005 .
36. Newman, M. E(2005). A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks. Social networks, 27(1), 39-54. [DOI:10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.009]
37. NSW Heritage Office and the Royal Australian Institute of Architects. Design in Context: Guidelines for Infill Development in the Historic Environment, NSW Heritage Office and the Royal Australian Institute of Achitects,2005
38. Omran, M. G., Engelbrecht, A. P., & Salman, A(2007). An overview of clustering methods. Intelligent Data Analysis, 11(6), 583-605. [DOI:10.3233/IDA-2007-11602]
39. Preservation Alliance for Greater Philadelphia. Sense of Place: Design Guidelines for New Construction in Historic Districts.2007.
40. Stevenson, M., Thompson, J. (2019). Health and the Compact City. In: Newton, P., Prasad, D., Sproul, A., White, S. (eds) Decarbonising the Built Environment. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. [DOI:10.1007/978-981-13-7940- 6_13.]
41. Barroso M ,Laborda J .(2022) .Digital transformation and the emergence of the Fintech sector:Systematic literature review ,Digital Business,Volume ,2 Issue ,100028 ,2 ISSN,2666-9544https//:doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus2022.100028 [DOI:10.1016/j.digbus.2022.100028]
42. Chang, Y.W., Huang, M.H., & Lin, C.W. (2015). Evolution of research subjects in library and information science base on keyword, bibliographical coupling, and co-citation analyses. Scientometrics, 105(3), 2071-2087.. [DOI:10.1007/s11192-015-1762-8]
43. Corporation, T.C(1999)Introduction to data mining and knowledge discovery: TwoCrows Corporation.
44. Falconer, M,& Frank,J, (1990). Sufficiency of Infrastructure Capacity for Infill Development. Journal of Urban planning and development. 116.(3). [DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(1990)116:3(137)]
45. Faust, K(2006). Comparing social networks: size, density, and local structure. Metodoloski zvezki, 3(2), 185 [DOI:10.51936/sdbv3216]
46. Jain, A. K., Murty, M. N., & Flynn, P. J(1999). Data clustering: a review. ACM computing surveys (CSUR), 31(3), 264-323. [DOI:10.1145/331499.331504]
47. Keinitz, R.(2001),. "Managing Maryland Growth: Models And Guidelines For Infill Developmenet" Maryland Department of planning Retrieved..
48. Keong Choong, K(2008). Intellectual capital: definitions, categorization and reporting models. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9(4), 609-638. [DOI:10.1108/14691930810913186]
49. Kohler, H.-P., Behrman, J. R., & Watkins, S. C(2001). The density of social networks and fertility decisions: Evidence from South Nyanza District, Kenya. Demography, 38(1), 43-58. [DOI:10.1353/dem.2001.0005]
50. Kuzior A, Sira M. (2022). A Bibliometric Analysis of Blockchain Technology Research Using VOSviewer. Sustainability; 14(13):8206. https:// doi.org/10.3390/su14138206 [DOI:10.3390/su14138206]
51. Maryland Department of Planning. Estimating Residential Development Capacity: A Guidebook for Analysis and Implementation in Maryland,2005 .
52. Newman, M. E(2005). A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks. Social networks, 27(1), 39-54. [DOI:10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.009]
53. NSW Heritage Office and the Royal Australian Institute of Architects. Design in Context: Guidelines for Infill Development in the Historic Environment, NSW Heritage Office and the Royal Australian Institute of Achitects,2005
54. Omran, M. G., Engelbrecht, A. P., & Salman, A(2007). An overview of clustering methods. Intelligent Data Analysis, 11(6), 583-605. [DOI:10.3233/IDA-2007-11602]
55. Preservation Alliance for Greater Philadelphia. Sense of Place: Design Guidelines for New Construction in Historic Districts.2007.
56. Stevenson, M., Thompson, J. (2019). Health and the Compact City. In: Newton, P., Prasad, D., Sproul, A., White, S. (eds) Decarbonising the Built Environment. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. [DOI:10.1007/978-981-13-7940- 6_13.]
57. Barroso M ,Laborda J .(2022) .Digital transformation and the emergence of the Fintech sector:Systematic literature review ,Digital Business,Volume ,2 Issue ,100028 ,2 ISSN,2666-9544https//:doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus2022.100028 [DOI:10.1016/j.digbus.2022.100028]
58. Chang, Y.W., Huang, M.H., & Lin, C.W. (2015). Evolution of research subjects in library and information science base on keyword, bibliographical coupling, and co-citation analyses. Scientometrics, 105(3), 2071-2087.. [DOI:10.1007/s11192-015-1762-8]
59. Corporation, T.C(1999)Introduction to data mining and knowledge discovery: TwoCrows Corporation.
60. Falconer, M,& Frank,J, (1990). Sufficiency of Infrastructure Capacity for Infill Development. Journal of Urban planning and development. 116.(3). [DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(1990)116:3(137)]
61. Faust, K(2006). Comparing social networks: size, density, and local structure. Metodoloski zvezki, 3(2), 185 [DOI:10.51936/sdbv3216]
62. Jain, A. K., Murty, M. N., & Flynn, P. J(1999). Data clustering: a review. ACM computing surveys (CSUR), 31(3), 264-323. [DOI:10.1145/331499.331504]
63. Keinitz, R.(2001),. "Managing Maryland Growth: Models And Guidelines For Infill Developmenet" Maryland Department of planning Retrieved..
64. Keong Choong, K(2008). Intellectual capital: definitions, categorization and reporting models. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9(4), 609-638. [DOI:10.1108/14691930810913186]
65. Kohler, H.-P., Behrman, J. R., & Watkins, S. C(2001). The density of social networks and fertility decisions: Evidence from South Nyanza District, Kenya. Demography, 38(1), 43-58. [DOI:10.1353/dem.2001.0005]
66. Kuzior A, Sira M. (2022). A Bibliometric Analysis of Blockchain Technology Research Using VOSviewer. Sustainability; 14(13):8206. https:// doi.org/10.3390/su14138206 [DOI:10.3390/su14138206]
67. Maryland Department of Planning. Estimating Residential Development Capacity: A Guidebook for Analysis and Implementation in Maryland,2005 .
68. Newman, M. E(2005). A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks. Social networks, 27(1), 39-54. [DOI:10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.009]
69. NSW Heritage Office and the Royal Australian Institute of Architects. Design in Context: Guidelines for Infill Development in the Historic Environment, NSW Heritage Office and the Royal Australian Institute of Achitects,2005
70. Omran, M. G., Engelbrecht, A. P., & Salman, A(2007). An overview of clustering methods. Intelligent Data Analysis, 11(6), 583-605. [DOI:10.3233/IDA-2007-11602]
71. Preservation Alliance for Greater Philadelphia. Sense of Place: Design Guidelines for New Construction in Historic Districts.2007.
72. Stevenson, M., Thompson, J. (2019). Health and the Compact City. In: Newton, P., Prasad, D., Sproul, A., White, S. (eds) Decarbonising the Built Environment. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. [DOI:10.1007/978-981-13-7940- 6_13.]
73. Barroso M ,Laborda J .(2022) .Digital transformation and the emergence of the Fintech sector:Systematic literature review ,Digital Business,Volume ,2 Issue ,100028 ,2 ISSN,2666-9544https//:doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus2022.100028 [DOI:10.1016/j.digbus.2022.100028]
74. Chang, Y.W., Huang, M.H., & Lin, C.W. (2015). Evolution of research subjects in library and information science base on keyword, bibliographical coupling, and co-citation analyses. Scientometrics, 105(3), 2071-2087.. [DOI:10.1007/s11192-015-1762-8]
75. Corporation, T.C(1999)Introduction to data mining and knowledge discovery: TwoCrows Corporation.
76. Falconer, M,& Frank,J, (1990). Sufficiency of Infrastructure Capacity for Infill Development. Journal of Urban planning and development. 116.(3). [DOI:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(1990)116:3(137)]
77. Faust, K(2006). Comparing social networks: size, density, and local structure. Metodoloski zvezki, 3(2), 185 [DOI:10.51936/sdbv3216]
78. Jain, A. K., Murty, M. N., & Flynn, P. J(1999). Data clustering: a review. ACM computing surveys (CSUR), 31(3), 264-323. [DOI:10.1145/331499.331504]
79. Keinitz, R.(2001),. "Managing Maryland Growth: Models And Guidelines For Infill Developmenet" Maryland Department of planning Retrieved..
80. Keong Choong, K(2008). Intellectual capital: definitions, categorization and reporting models. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 9(4), 609-638. [DOI:10.1108/14691930810913186]
81. Kohler, H.-P., Behrman, J. R., & Watkins, S. C(2001). The density of social networks and fertility decisions: Evidence from South Nyanza District, Kenya. Demography, 38(1), 43-58. [DOI:10.1353/dem.2001.0005]
82. Kuzior A, Sira M. (2022). A Bibliometric Analysis of Blockchain Technology Research Using VOSviewer. Sustainability; 14(13):8206. https:// doi.org/10.3390/su14138206 [DOI:10.3390/su14138206]
83. Maryland Department of Planning. Estimating Residential Development Capacity: A Guidebook for Analysis and Implementation in Maryland,2005 .
84. Newman, M. E(2005). A measure of betweenness centrality based on random walks. Social networks, 27(1), 39-54. [DOI:10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.009]
85. NSW Heritage Office and the Royal Australian Institute of Architects. Design in Context: Guidelines for Infill Development in the Historic Environment, NSW Heritage Office and the Royal Australian Institute of Achitects,2005
86. Omran, M. G., Engelbrecht, A. P., & Salman, A(2007). An overview of clustering methods. Intelligent Data Analysis, 11(6), 583-605. [DOI:10.3233/IDA-2007-11602]
87. Preservation Alliance for Greater Philadelphia. Sense of Place: Design Guidelines for New Construction in Historic Districts.2007.
88. Stevenson, M., Thompson, J. (2019). Health and the Compact City. In: Newton, P., Prasad, D., Sproul, A., White, S. (eds) Decarbonising the Built Environment. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. [DOI:10.1007/978-981-13-7940- 6_13.]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Journal of Researches in Islamic Architecture is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
