Volume 9, Issue 3 (9-2021)                   JRIA 2021, 9(3): 19-38 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Sholeh M, Roosta M, Hedayatimoghadam Z. Evaluation of Visual-Physical Integration Conditions of Valuable Heritage Complex using Heritage Impact Assessment (HIA) Method (Case Study: Zandieh's Shiraz Complex). JRIA 2021; 9 (3) :19-38
URL: http://jria.iust.ac.ir/article-1-1260-en.html
Department of Urban Planning & Design, Faculty of Art and Architecture, Shiraz University
Abstract:   (5005 Views)
The phenomenon of urban development has transformed existing cities and put the protection of historical heritage at the core of urban planning. However, considering the traditional concepts of heritage, which place valuable historical elements separately in a broader urban context, does not meet the goals of heritage protection to protect the character and importance of historical heritage. Thus, the change in the scale of heritage protection arose from the challenges of heritage protection, and the consequence was the emergence of the heritage urban landscape approach (HUL). The concept of integration was also considered in order to create a balance between protection and development approaches.
Any new construction project in the vicinity or in the Buffer Zones of the Heritage Site potentially has visual effects on the historical heritage that allow for the evaluating and evaluation of adverse effects before and during the implementation can be providing an effective strategy to minimize or mitigate adverse effects. In order to provide a solution, the UNESCO World Heritage Committee has proposed a method of heritage impact assessment. To satisfactorily assess of these potential threats, the organization suggests the investigating impact of these threats on Outstanding Universal Value.
This study seeks to application Heritage Impact Assessment Framework to evaluating the Visual-Physical Integrity of the valuable heritage complex, Zandieh's Shiraz Complex as a case study examine. The present study is applied in terms of purpose and uses a qualitative approach to achieve its goals. Inheritance effects in Zandieh's Shiraz Complex have been done by considering three criteria of lack of protection and mismanagement, sensitivity of features and severity of effects in three scales of valuable building complex; space organization; morphology and visual organization. This assessment shows that the result of the intensity of the effects for the first scale is 2.37, the second scale is 4.66 and the third scale is 5, which has seriously damaged the collection in these dimensions. Also, the priority matrix of effects shows that the first scale has low damage and the second and third scales have severe damage and have a very high priority for providing solutions for the protection of historical heritage.
Full-Text [PDF 1412 kb]   (875 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Definition and analysis of the latest theoretical and practical accomplishment in Islamic architecture and urbanism
Received: 2020/05/8 | Accepted: 2021/02/8 | Published: 2021/09/22

References
1. Abui, R et al. (1394). The Importance of Linking Historical Landscapes and New Conservation Tools, the Case Study: Old City of Isfahan. Iranian Journal of Restoration and Architecture. Number nine. Pages 59 - 67. (in Persian)
2. Afsar K. (1353). History of the old Fabric of Shiraz. Tehran: National Works Association. (in Persian)
3. Ardeshiri, M. et al. (1389). Shiraz Urban Identity, Shiraz: Navid Publications. (in Persian)
4. Bazregar, M. (1382). Urban Development and Main Construction of the City. Shiraz. Koshamehr. (in Persian)
5. Che Amat, R. (2018). Inheriting the City: Historic Urban Landscape of George Town UNESCO World Heritage Site. PLANNING MALAYSIA: Journal of The Malaysian Institute of Planners VOLUME 16 ISSUE 1 (2018), Page 205 - 210 [DOI:10.21837/pm.v16i5.424]
6. Fadaei Nezhad, S. Eshrati, P. Eshrati, D. (2016). Developing a Conceptual Framework of Integrity in Urban Heritage Conservation. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 9(16), 95-104. [DOI:10.26687/archnet-ijar.v9i1.473]
7. Fadaei Nezhad, S. Eshrati, P. Eshrati, D. (2016). Developing a Conceptual Framework of Integrity in Urban Heritage Conservation. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 9(16), 95-104. [DOI:10.26687/archnet-ijar.v9i1.473]
8. ICOMOS, ICCROM and IUCN. (2013). International World Heritage Expert Meeting on Visual Integrity, Agra, India Background Document Prepared by The World Heritage Centre.
9. ICOMOS. (2008). The World Heritage List, what is OUV? Defining the Outstanding Universal Value of Cultural World Heritage Properties, An ICOMOS study compiled by Jukka Jokilehto.
10. ICOMOS. (2011). Guidance on Heritage Impact Assessments for Cultural World Heritage Properties A publication of the International Council on Monuments and Sites.
11. Ismail Dukht, m. (1396). Interventions of regnant viewpoint on the aesthetics in three historical periods of Zand Street in Shiraz. Journal of Art and Civilization of the East, Fifth Year, No. 18, 54-43. (in Persian)
12. Jokilehto, J. (2006). Considerations on authenticity and integrity in world heritage context. City & Time 2 (1): 1. [online] URL:http://www.ct.ceci-br.org
13. Martini, V. (2013). The conservation of historic urban landscapes: an approach (Doctoral dissertation, V. Martini).
14. Pirnia, M.K.(2013). Cognitive of Iranian architecture style, Tehran: Soroush Danesh. Press. (in Persian)
15. Scheffler, N. (2010). Visual Integrity of Historic Urban Landscapes. Hero Expert Workshop, Vilnius, 9-11.
16. Seyedashrafi, S. Ravankhahb, M. Weidnerc, S. Schmidt, M. (2017). Applying Heritage Impact Assessment to urban development: World Heritage property of Masjede Jame of Isfahan in Iran. Sustainable Cities and Society 213. [DOI:10.1016/j.scs.2017.01.002]
17. Stovel, H. (2007). Effective Use of Authenticity and Integrity as World Heritage Qualiifying Conditions. City & Time 2 (3): 3. [Online] Url: Http://Www.Ct.Ceci-Br.Org, 32 - 34.
18. UNESCO. (2011). United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Recommendation on the Historic Urban Landscape، Paris.
19. Veldpaus, L. Ana R. Pereira, R. Bernard J. F. (2013). Urban Heritage: Putting the Past into the Future. The historic environment, Vol. 4 No. 1, 3-18. [DOI:10.1179/1756750513Z.00000000022]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Iran University of Science & Technology

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb