fa بررسی تطبیقی معیار‌های کرامت انسانی به عنوان یکی از ویژگی‌های شهر مطلوب اسلامی در محله‌های نوساز و قدیمی (مورد پژوهشی: محله‌های حکیمیه و خیابان ایران شهر تهران) تبیین و تحلیل آخرین دستاوردهای نظری و عملی در معماری و شهرسازی اسلامی Definition and analysis of the latest theoretical and practical accomplishment in Islamic architecture and urbanism پژوهشي Research <h1 dir="RTL"><span style="font-size:12px;"><span dir="RTL" lang="AR-SA"><span style="line-height:107%">کرامت انسانی، به معنای ارج نهادن به گوهر و وجود انسان به‌عنوان برترین مخلوق خداوند است. این مفهوم می‌تواند در برنامه‌ها و مداخلات شهرسازان، تعبیری فضایی پیدا کند. برای نمونه به نظر می‌رسد بتوان میان محلاتی که سطح بالاتری از کرامت انسانی را برای ساکنان و بهره‌وران خود قائل می‌شوند؛ و محلاتی که کمتر این معیار را محقق می‌کنند؛ تمایز قائل شد. این پژوهش با بررسی یک نمونه محله‌ی قدیمی و یک نمونه محله‌ی نوساز درصدد است که بتواند به این پرسش پاسخ دهد که آیا محلات جدیدالتاسیس توانسته‌&shy;اند دست‌کم به اندازه محلات قدیمی در حفظ کرامت انسانی موفق باشند؟ این پژوهش از نوع توسعه&shy;‌ای بوده و روش تحقیق آن تطبیقی است. برای این منظور، نخست معیارهای کرامت انسانی با استناد به آرای علمای مسلمان و آثار اندیشمندان غیرمسلمان تبیین می‌گردد. سپس برای سنجش هر یک از معیارهای کرامت انسانی، تعدادی گویه و سوال تدوین شده که پرسشنامه‌ای نیمه‌ساخت‌یافته را تشکیل می&shy;دهند. پس از تأیید روایی و پایایی، این پرسش‌نامه در دو محله به صورت تطبیقی سنجیده می‌شود.</span></span> <span dir="RTL" lang="AR-SA"><span style="line-height:107%"><span style="color:black">نتایج حاصل از پیمایش نشان می&shy;‌دهد </span></span></span><span dir="RTL" lang="FA"><span style="line-height:107%"><span style="color:black">معیارهای کرامت انسانی در محله سنتی و قدیمی خیابان ایران بیشتر از محله جدید و نوساز حکیمیه محقق شده است.</span></span></span></span></h1> The concept of human dignity means honoring the essence and existence of man as God&#39;s highest creation. This concept can also be spatially interpreted in urban planners&#39; programs and interventions. For example, it would seem to be possible to distinguish between neighborhoods who provide higher levels of human dignity for their residents than those who do not meet this criterion. Old and traditional neighborhoods of Iranian cities, may have weaknesses in meeting the new expectations of residents because of infrastructure degradation and changes in urban needs. However, they are more attractive than new neighborhoods yet because of their respect to some qualities. This study aims to answer the question that what are the criteria of human dignity and have the newly built neighborhoods (case of Hakimieh in the west of Tehran, Iran) succeeded in preserving human dignity at least as much as the old ones (the case of Iran Street neighborhood in the central historic context of Tehran)?<br> Accordingly, this paper is developmental comparative research. The definition of the criteria of human dignity is based on the opinions of Muslim scholars, as well as the works of non-Muslim scholars. Data collection has also been done through the archival and field survey methods. In this framework, some questions have been formulated to form a semi-structured questionnaire to measure each criteria of human dignity (derived from the provided theoretical framework). In each of the two neighborhoods, 100 questionnaires (a total of 200 questionnaires) were completed. The sample size was estimated using Cochran formula and random sampling. It should be noted that the two neighborhoods had similar conditions in terms of land prices and income levels, but they were differed in time of constructions.<br> The results of the survey show that the criteria of human dignity as a characteristic of the desirable Islamic city in the traditional and old neighborhood of Iran Street have been realized more than the new and modern neighborhood of Hakimieh. Findings show that the Hakimieh neighborhood is not far from the traditional Iran Street neighborhood, in terms of physical facilities and services (measures of intrinsic dignity such as &quot;facilities for education&quot; and &quot;level of well-being and infrastructures&quot;). However, according to spiritual values of dignity (such as &quot;unity&quot; and &quot;participation in charities&quot;), Hakimieh is significantly weaker than Iran Street neighborhood. As a result, it may be possible to claim that purely physical approaches to urban planning (such as providing services per capita) have failed to generate sufficient human dignity in the newly formed neighborhoods. Future studies can first replicate this assay in different neighborhoods of Tehran and other cities of Iran. Secondly, they can evaluate the programs and human dignity in them: programs such as comprehensive plans, renovation plans, and other interventions in the residential contexts. کرامت انسانی, محله, حکیمیه, خیابان ایران, تهران Human Dignity, Neighborhood, Hakimieh, Iran Street, Tehran 79 100 http://jria.iust.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-1806-1&slc_lang=fa&sid=1 Reza Motahar رضا مطهر rezamotahar95@gmail.com 180031947532846007161 180031947532846007161 No IUST دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران Seyed Abdolhadi Daneshpour سیدعبدالهادی دانشپور Daneshpour@iust.ac.ir 180031947532846007162 180031947532846007162 Yes IUST دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران Mohammadsaleh Shokouhibidhendi محمدصالح شکوهی بیدهندی shokouhi@iust.ac.ir 180031947532846007163 180031947532846007163 No IUST دانشکده معماری و شهرسازی، دانشگاه علم و صنعت ایران